Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

server/proxy/tcpproxy: reuse addr in TCPProxy.Run #19198

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

callthingsoff
Copy link
Contributor

"addr" is the result of net.JoinHostPort which supports IPv6 address.

Rather than ranging "tp.Endpoints" again, it's better to reuse "addr" in the first loop to collect "eps".

See #7942 and #7943 for context.

Please read https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-flow.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @callthingsoff. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

"addr" is the result of net.JoinHostPort which supports IPv6 address.

Rather than ranging "tp.Endpoints" again, it's better to reuse
"addr" in the first loop to collect "eps".

See etcd-io#7942 and etcd-io#7943 for context.

Signed-off-by: Jes Cok <[email protected]>
@callthingsoff callthingsoff force-pushed the reuse_addr_in_TCPProxy_Run branch from f0f7e1d to 88a1bc3 Compare January 15, 2025 14:08
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.85%. Comparing base (ce4b4e5) to head (88a1bc3).
Report is 28 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
server/proxy/tcpproxy/userspace.go 56.66% <100.00%> (-0.36%) ⬇️

... and 18 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19198      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.82%   68.85%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35627    35626       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits        24519    24530      +11     
+ Misses       9688     9678      -10     
+ Partials     1420     1418       -2     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce4b4e5...88a1bc3. Read the comment docs.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Jan 16, 2025

/ok-to-test

@callthingsoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@callthingsoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@ivanvc ivanvc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks, @callthingsoff.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, callthingsoff, ivanvc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit 831fa7a into etcd-io:main Jan 18, 2025
36 checks passed
@callthingsoff callthingsoff deleted the reuse_addr_in_TCPProxy_Run branch January 18, 2025 09:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants